به هدف نگذاشتن در سال جديد فكر كنيد

10 پاسخ به “به هدف نگذاشتن در سال جديد فكر كنيد”

1. شما لطف دارید؛ بسیار بسیار تشکر می‌کنم. ضمنا من استاد نیستم؛ یک دانش‌جوی جوان‌ام هنوز.
   و اما بعد:
   1. واقعا تمثیل بسیار زیبایی داشتید! بسیار لذت بردم و استفاده کردم. 🙂
   2. من هم‌چنان روی حرف‌ام هستم و اصلا هم تعارف نبود. منتظر ترجمه‌ی متن کامنت قبلی هستم.

   ارادتمند:)

2. سلام.
   1. البته من نميخواستم متن رو نادرست بخونم. بخصوص نزد شما استاد عزيز 🙂 ولي ميخواستم بيشتر روي اين مطلب بحث بشه. چون درست در لحظه اي بود که خودم نرم افزاري را براي اينکار ساخته بودم و بنا به سليقه و دانش خودم داشتم اهداف رو ترسيم ميکردم و توي اونها گير کرده بودم. اتفاقا مشکل هم همين چيزي بود که براگمان و شما به اون اشاره داشتيد.
   بعد به منابع فوق برخوردم. مطلب کمي واضح تر شد. بعد از پست نظر، به اين مطلب تا شب و فردا فکر ميکردم. به نظرم رسيد ما در قرآن هم به نوعي جمع اين دو را داريم. يعني خدا هدف گذاري هاي صفر و يکي نداره. بر اساس يکسري دستورالعملها، چهار هدف تعيين کرده، دو هدف حداقلي و دو هدف حداکثري، هدف بد حداقلي = جهنم، هدف بد حداکثري = اسفل سافلين (مثلا)، هدف خوب حداقلي = بهشت، هدف خوب حداکثري = لقاء الله. مابين اين هدفها هيچ جايي مشخص نيست. مسير رسيدن به اين هدفها به خوبي ترسيم شده ولي ارزش گذاري روي کاري که انجام ميدي نداريم. خودش اين ارزش را ميزاره. شايد اين روش را بشه براي مديران عامل و سازمانها پياده کرد. بنظرم از لجاجت، رقابت ناسالم، حسادت و استرس بيهوده ميتونه جلوگيري کنه.

   2. چشم ممنون از دعوت شما، من سعي خودمو ميکنم. تعارف اومد نيومد داره ها!!!!
   3. بازهم ممنون از شما. بقول وفاي عزيز – که خودش هم الحق جزو فعالين است – شما تلاشهاي ارزنده اي دارين. من هم غبطه ميخورم و هم استفاده ميکنم، هم مشتري براتون جمع ميکنم :)))

3. ممنونم. به نكات مهم و درستي اشاره كرديد. 🙂

4. سپاس از لطف شما و تفسير جالبي كه ارائه كرديد. با تلورانس گذاشتن كاملا موافقم. 🙂

5. ممنون از اين همه تلاش‌تان براي اثبات نادرست بودن اين متن. من پيشنهاد مي‌كنم اين متن را ترجمه كنيد تا به‌نام خودتان در گزاره‌ها منتشر شود. 🙂

6. ممنونم از لطف شما 🙂

7. آقای نعمتی شهاب عزیز،
   هر چه حساب و کتاب میکنم، نمیفهمم این همه مطلب خوب را از کجا میآوری و در چه زمانی ترجمه میکنی و چطور هیچکدام را هم به نام خودت جا نمیزنی.
   واقعاً دست مریزاد، نگاه دیگری بود، استفاده کردم
   سربلند باشی

8. سلام مجدد. مطلب زير را هم در … خواندم، حيفم آمد بعنوان کامنت زير اين مطلب نگذارم.

   Areas of Focus = Goals = Projects

   As I’ve been reading through this message board, I notice that people sometimes respond “That really isn’t a project, it is more of an area of focus”. In thinking about this, I have an observation to share. This may be “discovering fire” to most of you, but these thoughts are clarifying things for me.

   “Areas of Focus” really are goals (or they should be). Furthermore, a well-defined goal is really a project. All active projects should have next actions, therefore, there should ALWAYS be a next action for any active goal or “area of focus”. If not, you’re really CHOOSING to put that goal or Area of Focus to “someday/maybe”.

   Let me elaborate…

   What is a project? A project is something that has a clear outcome that requires one or more actions to complete. Some projects only require one or two next actions. Others are more complex and may have sub projects.

   What is a goal? More importantly, what is a well-defined goal? You may say you have a goal to lose weight. However, if you want to truly achieve this goal, you need to make it more specific and more measurable. Instead of “lose weight”, your real goal is to “Achieve a weight of 150 pounds” (or whatever). Right? How do you achieve this goal? You complete several small projects related to that goal, such as research eating habits and pick one you can live with or make an appointment for a physical, or join a gym. In order for a goal to be meaningful, it has to have a well-defined outcome. And it probably requires one or more actions to complete. Isn’t that the definition of a project?

   So…therefore, a goal is nothing more than a project.

   What is an area of focus? David defines it as your responsibilities or roles in life combined with your values, things such as parent, spouse, self-development, creative expression, financial management, etc. This may be more controversial, but I propose that these roles are really closer to projects too. Let me explain…

   When you say you have an “area of focus” of financial management, what does that mean? It means different things to different people. Heck, it means different things at different points in your life! 20 years ago, my financial focus was getting out of the debt my ex-husband incurred. Now that I’m living debt-free, it means making wise investments for my future. But either way, in order for me to be honoring my “area of focus”, I need to have a clear vision of what it means to me now. I need to define what is being a successful financial manager. That’s not really any different than having a clear vision of a successful outcome for a project. For example, being a successful financial manager may mean: Paying all my bills on time, Having a retirement plan for my future, Owning my own home, etc. But any one of these things is a project. In practice, it may be better to restate the “area of focus” as an affirmation such as: “I’m an effective financial manager” and define it.

   So….for an area of focus to be a part of your life, it requires a clear understanding of the outcome and probably takes one or more actions to complete—and that’s a project.

   Let me make this even more abstract 

   One of my roles is as a spouse. Therefore, one of my areas of focus is “Relationship as Spouse”. Another way to write that is “Maintain my relationship with my spouse.” Maintain. Hmmm… Is that really what I want? Possibly. At some points in my life, Improve would be a better word. Right now, I would say Maintain isn’t right either. I really want to “Deepen my relationship with my spouse” or “take it to the next level”. I propose that this is a project. Why? It would probably be smart for me to take a look at my relationship with my spouse now and consider what I mean by “taking it to the next level”. I’m not going to share my own vision here, but I have a pretty clear idea what that “next level” looks like. I’m a little less clear how I get there  But let’s say I just want to maintain my happy marriage. It would still be smart for me to consider what I mean by “happy marriage”. What is it that makes it happy? My spouse and I spend lots of time doing shared activities, we take the time to relax and enjoy each others company, we laugh, etc. So, in order to maintain my relationship, I need to make sure I’m making time for those things, that I’m planning fun activities that we enjoy. If I choose to put off all those activities and fill my life with my dogs and my work, I’m making a choice. A choice to put my marriage on the someday/maybe list. I may get away with that for a month or two, but if I make that choice for too long, I won’t have a relationship to maintain. Relationships—any relationship—requires time and commitment.

   Therefore, even a relationship is really a project. It is a project that requires a clear vision of success and one or more actions to achieve.

   Where am I going with all this?

   I can understand that I may want to keep these roles/areas of focus/goals in an area separate from my active projects, but they aren’t different than projects and they should be reviewed and I need to ask myself the questions “What is a successful outcome” and “what is the next action” for these things just like any other project if I want to avoid open loops.

   http://www.davidco.com/forum/showthread.php?3807-Areas-of-Focus-Goals-Projects

9. سلام. منهم با صالحي موافقم. راستش بنظر مياد نبود هدف ميتونه ضربه هاي بزرگي به کار بزنه. اينکه من از مسير رفتن به تهران لذت ببرم ولي هدف رسيدن به تهران را در مثلا زمان مشخصي نداشته باشم را نميتونم بفهمم. اينطوري شايد شما کلا آنقدر به زيباييهاي مسير جذب بشي که ديگه رسيدن يادت بره!
   فکر ميکنم مسئله اصلي اونجايي هست که شما بايد تلرانسي را براي هدف بگذاري، همچنين ارزشهايي که بدون اون ارزشها رسيدن به هدف بي ارزش باشه. همچنين حداقلي که اون هدف تامين بشه. يا حتي استراتژي خروج تو رو از مسير رسيدن به اون هدف مشخص کنه تا منابعتو بي دليل خرج نکني.
   مثلا در مثال بچه ها، ارزش طي اين مسير، درست انجام دادن وظايف هم هست. نه فقط رسيدن سروقت دم در خانه. اينطوري بحث کامل ميشود.
   دست مريزاد و ممنون از وبلاگ ارزشمندتون

10. مطلب عالی بود. تا حالا به هدف گذاری از این جنبه دقت نکرده بودم. ولب خب… کلا به نظر من تو هیچ موردی قانون کلی وجود نداره. یعنی نباید خیال خودمون رو راحت کنیم و بگین مساله الف از روش ب حل میشه و تمام. بعد از یه مدت بگیم ب کامل نبود و پ بهتره.
    به نظر من بیشتر اوقات مسائل با ترکیبی از روش ها حل میشن و هنر اینه که بدونیم کی باید روی کدوم روش تاکید بیشتری بکنیم. مثلا اگه هدف نهایی رو تعیین نکنیم و فقط مسیر تعیین کنیم، ممکنه با سرعت خیلی پایین و بی انگیزه مسیر رو طی کنیم و اگر هم روی هدف نهایی تاکید کنیم همون مشکلاتی پیش میاد که مقاله بهشون اشاره کرده.